AI Guides

Practical Guides for Putting AI to Work

Concise, actionable guides for leaders and teams planning AI initiatives, covering readiness, technique selection, evaluation and responsible use.

Illustration of an AI guidebook opening with step-by-step panels

Guide 1

AI readiness checklist

Use this checklist to assess whether a proposed AI initiative has the foundations it needs. Gaps are not reasons to stop; they show what to address first.

Strategy and use case

  • The task to improve is specific and described in plain language
  • A business owner is accountable for the outcome
  • Success measures and a current baseline are agreed
  • The cost of an AI mistake is understood and acceptable with review

Data

  • The data or documents the AI needs are identified and accessible
  • Data quality and freshness are known, including gaps
  • Sensitive and personal data are classified
  • Representative examples exist for testing

Technology and integration

  • It is clear where AI output will appear in existing tools
  • Integration options (APIs, exports) for source and target systems are known
  • Hosting and data-residency requirements are defined
  • Monitoring and logging responsibilities are assigned

People and governance

  • Users have been involved in defining the problem
  • Review responsibilities for AI output are defined
  • An AI usage policy exists or is being drafted
  • Training and change communication are planned

Guide 2

RAG or fine-tuning? Choosing how to customise a language model

Retrieval-augmented generation and fine-tuning solve different problems. Many teams reach for fine-tuning when retrieval would be simpler, cheaper and easier to keep current.

Comparison of RAG and fine-tuning
ConsiderationRetrieval-augmented generation (RAG)Fine-tuning
Primary purposeGive the model access to specific, current informationTeach the model a style, format or specialised behaviour
Keeping knowledge currentUpdate documents and re-index; no retrainingRequires retraining when knowledge changes
Citations and traceabilityNatural: answers can link to source passagesDifficult: knowledge is absorbed into model weights
Data neededWell-organised source documentsMany high-quality example input-output pairs
Access controlCan filter retrieved content per userCannot easily restrict what the model has learned
Typical usePolicy assistants, product Q&A, research supportConsistent tone, structured outputs, domain phrasing at scale

Our advice

  • Start with good prompting and retrieval; measure quality on real questions
  • Consider fine-tuning only when retrieval and prompting cannot reach the quality bar, or when volume makes a smaller tuned model more economical
  • The two techniques can be combined: a tuned model for style, with retrieval for facts

Guide 3

Evaluating an AI feature before launch

Evaluation turns opinions about AI quality into evidence. A simple, repeatable process is far better than ad-hoc testing.

  1. 1

    Collect real examples

    Gather representative inputs from the actual process, including difficult and unusual cases.

  2. 2

    Define good output

    For each example, record the expected answer or the criteria a reviewer would use.

  3. 3

    Choose measures

    Accuracy of extracted fields, factual correctness, citation quality, tone, refusal behaviour when information is missing.

  4. 4

    Run and score

    Score every prompt, model or retrieval change against the full set, combining automated checks with expert review.

  5. 5

    Test safety

    Include attempts to misuse the system, such as prompt injection or requests outside scope, and confirm safe behaviour.

  6. 6

    Set launch criteria

    Agree the minimum scores required to launch and the monitoring that will continue in production.

Guide 4

Writing an AI usage policy for your team

A short, clear policy helps employees use AI tools productively while protecting the organisation. It should enable, not just restrict.

Approved tools

List which AI tools are approved for work use and how to request new ones.

Data rules

Specify which categories of information may and may not be entered into AI tools.

Human responsibility

Make clear that people remain responsible for work they produce with AI assistance.

Disclosure

State when AI use should be disclosed to customers or colleagues.

Quality checks

Require verification of facts, figures and citations produced by AI.

Reporting

Explain how to report problems, errors or concerns about AI behaviour.

Go deeper

Related reading

Ready to apply these guides?

We can facilitate an AI readiness workshop with your team and help prioritise use cases.